jak-project/.vs/launch.vs.json

419 lines
11 KiB
JSON
Raw Normal View History

{
"version": "0.2.1",
"defaults": {},
"configurations": [
2020-08-29 14:52:45 -04:00
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "goalc-test.exe (bin\\goalc-test.exe)",
"name": "Tests - Unit-Tests - Summary",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"--gtest_brief=1"
]
2020-08-29 14:52:45 -04:00
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "goalc-test.exe (bin\\goalc-test.exe)",
"name": "Tests - Unit-Tests - Verbose",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"--gtest_brief=0"
]
2020-08-29 14:52:45 -04:00
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "goalc-test.exe (bin\\goalc-test.exe)",
"name": "Tests - Draft Tests - Verbose",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"--gtest_brief=0",
"--gtest_filter=\"*Draft*\""
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "goalc-test.exe (bin\\goalc-test.exe)",
"name": "Tests - TypeConsistency - Verbose",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"--gtest_brief=0",
"--gtest_filter=\"*TypeConsistency*\""
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "goalc-test.exe (bin\\goalc-test.exe)",
"name": "Tests - TypeConsistency - Jak 2 - Verbose",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"--gtest_brief=0",
"--gtest_filter=\"*Jak2TypeConsistency*\""
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "goalc-test.exe (bin\\goalc-test.exe)",
"name": "Tests - WithGameTests - Verbose",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"--gtest_brief=0",
"--gtest_filter=\"*WithGameTests*\""
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "offline-test.exe (bin\\offline-test.exe)",
"name": "Tests - Offline Tests - Jak 1",
"args": [
"--iso_data_path",
"${workspaceRoot}/iso_data/jak1",
"--game",
"jak1"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "offline-test.exe (bin\\offline-test.exe)",
"name": "Tests - Offline Tests - Jak 2",
"args": [
"--iso_data_path",
"${workspaceRoot}/iso_data/jak2",
"--game",
docs: add support for `:override-doc` in method declarations as well as documenting state handlers (#2139) Adding support for better child-type method docstrings. This is a problem unique to methods. Usually, a child-type will have the same signature and a common name will apply, but the implementation is different. This means, you probably want a different docstring to describe what is happening. Currently this is possible to do via `:replace`. The problem with replace is two fold: - a replaced method ends up in the generated `deftype`...because you usually change the signature! - we don't put docstrings in the `deftype` in normal GOAL, this is just something we do for the `all-types` file (they go in the `defmethod` instead) - more importantly, this means anytime you now want to change the parent's name/args/return type -- you have to apply that change everywhere. So this is a better design you can now just declare the method like so: ```clj (:override-doc "my new docstring" <method_id>) ``` And internally a pseudo-replaced method will be added, but it will inherit everything from the parent (except the docstring of course) Unrelated - I also made all the keyword args for declaring methods not depend on ordering This also adds support for documenting virtual and non-virtual state handlers. For example: ```clj (:states (part-tester-idle (:event "test") symbol)) ``` or ```clj (idle () _type_ :state (:event "test") 20) ``` I will probably add the ability to give some sort of over-view docstring at a later date. Co-authored-by: water <awaterford111445@gmail.com>
2023-01-21 20:45:45 -05:00
"jak2"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "offline-test.exe (bin\\offline-test.exe)",
"name": "Tests - Offline Tests - Jak 3",
"args": [
"--iso_data_path",
"${workspaceRoot}/iso_data/jak3",
"--game",
"jak3"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "offline-test.exe (bin\\offline-test.exe)",
"name": "Tests - Offline Tests - Jak 1 - Specific File",
"args": [
"--iso_data_path",
"${workspaceRoot}/iso_data/jak1",
"--game",
"jak1",
"--file",
"euler-h"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "offline-test.exe (bin\\offline-test.exe)",
"name": "Tests - Offline Tests - Jak 2 - Specific File",
"args": [
"--iso_data_path",
"${workspaceRoot}/iso_data/jak2",
"--game",
"jak2",
"--file",
"oracle-texture"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "gk.exe (bin\\gk.exe)",
"name": "Game - Jak 1 - Runtime",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"-v",
"--game",
"jak1",
"--",
"-fakeiso",
"-debug"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "gk.exe (bin\\gk.exe)",
"name": "Game - Jak 1 - Runtime (boot)",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"-v",
"--game",
"jak1",
"--",
"-boot",
"-fakeiso",
"-debug"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "gk.exe (bin\\gk.exe)",
"name": "Game - Jak 2 - Runtime (no boot)",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"-v",
"--game",
"jak2",
"--",
"-fakeiso",
"-debug"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "gk.exe (bin\\gk.exe)",
"name": "Game - Jak 2 - Runtime (boot)",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"-v",
"--game",
"jak2",
"--",
"-boot",
"-fakeiso",
"-debug"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "gk.exe (bin\\gk.exe)",
"name": "Game - Jak 2 - Runtime (release)",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"-v",
"--game",
"jak2",
"--",
"-boot",
"-fakeiso"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "gk.exe (bin\\gk.exe)",
"name": "Game - Jak 3 - Runtime (boot)",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"-v",
"--game",
"jak3",
"--",
"-boot",
"-fakeiso",
"-debug"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "goalc.exe (bin\\goalc.exe)",
"name": "REPL - Jak 1",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"--user-auto",
"--game",
"jak1"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "goalc.exe (bin\\goalc.exe)",
"name": "REPL - Jak 2",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"--user-auto",
"--game",
"jak2"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "decompiler.exe (bin\\decompiler.exe)",
"name": "Decompiler - Jak 1",
"args": [
"${workspaceRoot}/decompiler/config/jak1/jak1_config.jsonc",
"${workspaceRoot}/iso_data",
"${workspaceRoot}/decompiler_out",
"--version",
"ntsc_v1"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "decompiler.exe (bin\\decompiler.exe)",
"name": "Decompiler - Jak 1 NTSC-U v2",
"args": [
"${workspaceRoot}/decompiler/config/jak1/jak1_config.jsonc",
"${workspaceRoot}/iso_data",
"${workspaceRoot}/decompiler_out",
"--version",
"ntsc_v2"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "decompiler.exe (bin\\decompiler.exe)",
"name": "Decompiler - Jak 1 PAL",
"args": [
"${workspaceRoot}/decompiler/config/jak1/jak1_config.jsonc",
"${workspaceRoot}/iso_data",
"${workspaceRoot}/decompiler_out",
"--version",
"pal"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "decompiler.exe (bin\\decompiler.exe)",
"name": "Decompiler - Jak 2",
"args": [
"${workspaceRoot}/decompiler/config/jak2/jak2_config.jsonc",
"${workspaceRoot}/iso_data",
"${workspaceRoot}/decompiler_out",
"--version",
"ntsc_v1"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "decompiler.exe (bin\\decompiler.exe)",
"name": "Decompiler - Jak 2 - Extract",
"args": [
"${workspaceRoot}/decompiler/config/jak2/jak2_config.jsonc",
"${workspaceRoot}/iso_data",
"${workspaceRoot}/decompiler_out",
"--version",
"ntsc_v1",
"--config-override \"{\\\"decompile_code\\\": false, \\\"levels_extract\\\": true, \\\"allowed_objects\\\": []}\""
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "decompiler.exe (bin\\decompiler.exe)",
"name": "Decompiler - Jak 3",
"args": [
"${workspaceRoot}/decompiler/config/jak3/jak3_config.jsonc",
"${workspaceRoot}/iso_data",
"${workspaceRoot}/decompiler_out",
"--version",
"ntsc_v1"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "decompiler.exe (bin\\decompiler.exe)",
"name": "Decompiler - Jak 3 - Extract",
"args": [
"${workspaceRoot}/decompiler/config/jak3/jak3_config.jsonc",
"${workspaceRoot}/iso_data",
"${workspaceRoot}/decompiler_out",
"--version",
"ntsc_v1",
"--config-override \"{\\\"decompile_code\\\": false, \\\"levels_extract\\\": true, \\\"allowed_objects\\\": []}\""
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "memory_dump_tool.exe (bin\\memory_dump_tool.exe)",
"name": "Tools - EE Memory Analyze - Jak 1",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"\"${workspaceRoot}/eeMemory.bin\"",
"--output-path",
"\"${workspaceRoot}\"",
"--game",
"jak1"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "memory_dump_tool.exe (bin\\memory_dump_tool.exe)",
"name": "Tools - EE Memory Analyze - Jak 2",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"\"${workspaceRoot}/eeMemory.bin\"",
"--output-path",
"\"${workspaceRoot}\"",
"--game",
"jak2"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "dgo_unpacker.exe (bin\\dgo_unpacker.exe)",
"name": "Tools - DGO Unpacker (test)",
"args": [
"C:\\GameData\\Jak1\\Backup\\DGO-PAL\\GAME",
"C:\\GameData\\Jak1\\Backup\\DISC-PAL\\CGO\\GAME.CGO"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "extractor.exe (bin\\extractor.exe)",
"name": "Tools - Extractor - Full",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"\"E:\\ISOs\\Jak\\Jak 1.iso\""
]
},
{
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "lsp.exe (bin\\lsp.exe)",
"name": "Tools - LSP",
"args": []
},
{
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "type_searcher.exe (bin\\type_searcher.exe)",
"name": "Tools - Type Searcher",
"args": [
"--game",
"jak2",
"--output-path",
"./search-results.json",
"--size",
255,
"--fields",
"[{\\\"type\\\":\\\"quaternion\\\",\\\"offset\\\":48}]"
]
},
{
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "formatter.exe (bin\\formatter.exe)",
"name": "Tools - Formatter - Inplace",
"args": [
"--write",
"--file",
"C:\\Users\\xtvas\\Repositories\\opengoal\\jak-project\\goal_src\\jak1\\engine\\camera\\cam-states.gc"
]
},
{
"type": "default",
"project": "CMakeLists.txt",
"projectTarget": "goalc-test.exe (bin\\goalc-test.exe)",
"name": "Tests - Formatter",
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
"args": [
"--gtest_brief=0",
"--gtest_filter=\"*FormatterTests*\""
]
2020-08-29 14:52:45 -04:00
}
]
g/j1: Cleanup all main issues in the formatter and format all of `goal_src/jak1` (#3535) This PR does two main things: 1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter keeping it from feeling mature and usable 2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.** - The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new config flag `format_code`. How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?: - I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files separately - I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py` - The results (eventually) were the same: ![Screenshot 2024-05-25 132900](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/015e6f20-8d19-49b7-9951-97fa88ddc6c2) > This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use. I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if you are curious: ![image](https://github.com/open-goal/jak-project/assets/13153231/0edfaba1-6d36-40f5-ab23-0642209867c4)
2024-06-05 22:17:31 -04:00
}